Shantona Chaudhury and Brodie Noga agrued for the Appellant at the ONCA in the case of S.H. v D.H.

February 2019

The case concerned an ex-spouse’s right to withdraw consent to the use of an in vitro embryo that had been created during the marriage. Neither ex-spouse was genetically related to the embryo. S.H. v D.H. is the first appellate consideration of how the Assisted Human Reproduction Act and its regulations govern the use of embryos.

Latest Posts

BY PapeChaudhuryLaw

Judge’s reasoning ‘tainted by his erroneous view’ of required notice, court rules

Paul Pape and Brodie Noga give the Lawyer’s Daily their view on what to take away from the recent ONCA decision in Champion v Intact,

VIEW ARTICLE

BY PapeChaudhuryLaw

Champion Products Corp v Intact Insurance, 2020 ONCA 111

Paul Pape and Brodie Noga, acting for the appellants, won this appeal on whether the motion judge erred in a dispute over a breach of

VIEW ARTICLE

BY PapeChaudhuryLaw

Vivekanandan v Terzian, 2020 ONCA 110

Shantona Chaudhury and Brodie Noga successfully appealed an application judge’s decision before the ONCA in a case involving a property dispute between next-door neighbours. At