-
POST BY: PapeChaudhuryLaw
In January 2015, the Court of Appeal released its highly-anticipated decision in Moore v. Getahun. The case was a medical malpractice action that occasioned great interest from the civil litigation
The Supreme Court of Canada’s intention in Hryniak v. Mauldin was to sow the seeds of a “culture shift” in the approach to summary judgment in Ontario, and to litigation in Canada.
-
A “rapid fire” review of key civil appeal decisions in 2013. Read More
-
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Clements v. Clements’ (1) can be described, with a pinch of poetic licence, as part requiem, part resurrection. The requiem is for
-
This paper aims to answer one question: what does waiver of tort allow a plaintiff to recover? While the approach outlined in this paper is not settled law (there is
-
Perspectives on being a first-year lawyer from Shantona Chaudhury. Although Paul J. Pape is unlike many lawyers, most – if not quite all – Shantona’s words of wisdom will be
-
In a January 2010 decision, Rosenhek v. Windsor Regional Hospital, 2010 ONCA 13 (“Rosenhek”), the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a trial decision awarding over 3 million dollars to a
-